The justifi cation of illegal anti-ecological behavior
نویسندگان
چکیده
Resumen Background: Not everyone considers breaches of environmental laws as reprehensible behaviors or to the same extent. Research on the causal explanations of illegal anti-ecological behavior given by individuals is useful to analyze the social support of environmental laws and their consolidation as social and/or personal norms. This study aims to analyze the explanations selected by participants as most likely for environmental transgressions perpetrated by other persons in participants’ surroundings. Method: 573 persons of both genders, aged between 17 and 74 years, living in a setting of high environmental protection answered a questionnaire including seven environmental breaches and 11 scales related to the amount of punishment that they would mete out to perpetrators, and possible causal explanations of the facts being described. Results: Data show that people generally consider illegal anti-ecological behavior as a refl ection of the “badness” of perpetrators, but that certain circumstances can lead anyone to behave illegally in environmental terms. Conclusions: These results are discussed comparing participants’ explanations with the explanations given by environmental transgressors in previous studies.
منابع مشابه
Holism and Apriority
The paper discusses Sosa’s view of intuitional knowledge and raises the question of the nature of refl ective justifi cation of intuitional beliefs. It is assumed, in agreement with Sosa, that pieces of belief of good researchers are typically refl ectively justifi ed, in addition to being immediately, fi rst-level justifi ed. Sosa has convincingly argued that refl ective justifi cation typical...
متن کاملThe justification of illegal anti-ecological behavior.
BACKGROUND Not everyone considers breaches of environmental laws as reprehensible behaviors or to the same extent. Research on the causal explanations of illegal anti-ecological behavior given by individuals is useful to analyze the social support of environmental laws and their consolidation as social and/or personal norms. This study aims to analyze the explanations selected by participants a...
متن کاملImplicit Nationalism as System Justification: the Case of the United States of America
America as a nation has self-perpetuating needs that do not always align with the needs or beliefs of individual Americans. As much as Americans may love their country and way of life, they do not always explicitly agree with the policies that best serve to bolster and perpetuate the nation, such as unyielding diplomatic stances, unilateral military action, or giving up civil liberties in excha...
متن کاملAntecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction and Guilt Following Ingroup Aggression
Three studies investigated the role of intergroup satisfaction in intergroup confl ict. After reading about real acts of aggression committed by an ingroup, participants reported how those actions made them feel and how much they would support similar aggression in the future. In all three studies, experiencing intergroup satisfaction increased support for similar aggression, whereas experienci...
متن کاملCapping progress on invasive species?
The European Commission recently published its long-awaited draft legislation on invasive alien species (1). The proposed regulation implements a key target of the European Union Biodiversity Strategy (2), aiming to bring EU policy in line with the Convention on Biological Diversity targets for 2020, which obliges signatories to identify and prioritize invasive alien species and their pathways ...
متن کامل